It seems that our Judiciary is not independent and seem to listen to 'instructions' given by the ruling 'unscrupulous' and power crazy UMNO-led Barisan Nasional government.
Yesterday's Stay of Execution against a High Court ruling that Datuk Seri Ir Nizar Jamaluddin is the legitimate Mentri Besar of Perak by the one-man Court of Appeal Judge seem to violate Section 54 of the Special Relief Act which disallowed any injunction to be granted when it interfered with the public duties of a government.
Section 54(d) states: “An injunction cannot be granted to interfere with the public duties of any department of any Government in Malaysia, or with the sovereign acts of a foreign Government.”
The stay of execution is tantamount to a form of injunction.
Looking at the way the Perak State is administered today, a imposter, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir has be legalised by the Stay of Execution granted by the Court of Appeal and if this 'crook' is allowed to continue to administer Perak State, a serious crisis would surface.
Its time for Malaysians to rename the Palace of Justice to Palace of Fools & Crooks.
9 comments:
whatever written by u is just a rubbish.
those umno and bn goons do not respect the law. the law of karma will haunt them later. at times i fell ashamed to be the citizen of malaysia.
Syed Saifuddin,
Can you pinpoint exactly what Kamal is writing is considered rubbish by you?
Please be fair as you say that it is rubbish but don't say why it is rubbish. Perhaps you might even want to correct him if the facts are wrong.
Otherwise, I think it is okay to express an opinion and he certainly has not insulted anyone by his expressions.
For example, are you saying that his quotation and application of Section 54(d) of the Special Relief Act is wrong ?
Okay, maybe he shouldn't be calling anyone crooks but I think he means it in a manner that indicates "taking something that is not legally yours" based on his perceived error of the judge in the lack of application of Section 54 of the Special Relief Act.
If you have an argument that supports the reason why Section 54 of the Special Relief Act does not apply, please comment.
And if you choose to tembak me, please refrain as I have not insulted you, called you names, or even discredited you in any way. In fact, I would also call Kamal opinions rubbish if you can provide good grounds.
100 sokong chauncey
Syed Saifuddin, when you say that Kamal is talking rubbish, you must be intelligent enough to qualify your statement or else you are the one who would appear to be a fool! You had commented in the other article that Nizar is a stooge of the DAP. Let me ask you this... the court of appeal judge by hastily granting the appeal to Zambry clearly identifies himself as a stooge of UMNO. Many Malaysians who were charged in court had to wait for years before their appeals are being heard but in Zambry's case it was within hours. We respect your political preference but you must also respect our dear brother Kamal's as well. Otherwise, there is no longer any other reason for you for be commenting here because bro Kamal is not here to tickle your ears. What he had written are facts and we highly respect his intelligence and ability in expressing them in his blog. Therefore, qualify yourself by showing some at least or else hold your peace!!
According to the Screenshots blog, the Court of Appeal judge, Ramly, is also mentioned in the VK Lingam saga.
Does anyone know in what context ?
I found some interesting revelations from a posting in Rocky's Bru blog :
Who is judge Ramli Ali, the judge that gave Zambry an stay within 3 hours?
Well, he is a Lingam appointed judge. A former Chief Registrar of the courts. When Lingam was talking to the disgraced Fairuz on how they were to manipulate the judiciary and appoint their cronies into the bench, Lingam said that Ramli was among the three preferred to be appointed by him. The other two were Datuk Heliliah Mohd Yusuf, a former Solicitor-General and Datuk Ahmad Maarop, a former commissioner of Law Revision. They were appointed as directed by Lingam and agreed upon by Vincent Tan and Mahathir on February 1. 2002.
Untuk makluman sila lihat
Independenc, Integrity, Accountability di blog Lim Kit Siang semasa kontroversi Lingam mencetus! (2007)
Khususnya -
"...There was reference of making “Datuk Heliliah, Datuk Ramli and Datuk Maroop” as judges — on 8th February 2002, Datuk Heliliah Mohd Yusuf, former Solicitor-General, Datuk Ramly Ali, a former Chief Registrar and Datuk Ahmad Maarop, a former Commissioner of Law Revision, received their letters of appointment as High Court judges from the Yang di Pertuan Agong. Their appointments were from Feb. 1, 2002. ..."- http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2007/09/21/ags-comments-on-lingam-tape-outrageous-is-he-for-judicial-independence-integrity-accountability/
Bukan itu aje!
Bukankah lagak OCPD ini dari Polis DiRaja Malaysia seperti seorang samseng? Sila kaji video ini dengan teliti -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIrZrxfHogc
Post a Comment