It has been reported that Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak had sworn in front of the 191 UMNO Divisional leaders, UMNO Youth, UMNO Wanita, UMNO Putera and UMNO Puteri during a Special session with UMNO President at the Dewan Merdeka, Putra World Trade Centre in Kuala Lumpur today that he NEVER knew or had an affair with Mongolian woman Altantuya Shariibu who had been murdered using a C4 explosive. Datuk Seri Najib further claimed that the alleged Statutory Declarations made by MalaysiaToday blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin and private investigator P Balasubramaniam are lies and are out to tarnish his good reputation and credibility.
DO YOU BELIEVE IT?
photo n news courtesy of Agendadaily
10 comments:
Najib don't have to swear to cover the lies. All we want to know is from Razak Baginda and his wife . Sooner or later they will review the truth.
do you believe him?
This man who wanted to bathe his keris in Chinese blood has now bathed it with Mongolian blood!
Dia berani bersumpah selepas ramai mufti dan ulamak komen sumpah atau bermahalah tidak digalakkan kecuali dalam kes-kes tertentu seperti kes suamiisteri, hartapusaka dll tetapi tidak ada seperti dalam kes najib ini, sebab itu dia berani bersumpah sekarang...najib pandai main politik dalam isu ini.
Harap orang ramai tidak termakan mainnan politik dia sekarang. yang penting akuan bersumpah Raja Petra dan P. Balasubramaniam mesti disiasat dengan telus..
DALAAM KES ANWAR, DIA TELAH BAWA KES TUDUHAN LIWATNYA KE MAHKAMAH SYARIAH UNTUK DIADILI MENGIKUT HUKUM SYARIAH....SELEPAS IKUT CADANGAN ARAHAN PARA ULAMAK.
cuba saudara ikuti keterangan dari salah seorang peguam syariah iaitu saudara YB Zulkifli Nordin, komen beliau spt berikut..
" Sebenarnya saya secara peribadi tidak bersetuju dengan sumpah bersumpah ni. Ini adalah amalan yang tidak sabit dari syariat Islam ataupun sunnah Nabi. Saya agak terkejut SS Mufti Perlis, yang juga sahabat saya mengemukakan cadangan tersbut. Tidak ada mana-mana hadis yang menunjukkan bersumpah ini amalan Nabi. Sebenarnya bersumpah dengan junjong kitab ini adalah amalan bukan Islam. Contohnya orang Kristian.
Didalam amalan Islam, sumpah ini adalah dalam bentuk bayyinah. Iaitu apabila seseorang dikenakan pertuduhan dalam Mahkamah Syariah dengan sesuatu tuduhan (saperti suami menuduh isteri berzina) maka menurut syariat iaitu usul fiqh bahawa beban bukti ke atas yang mendakwa..manakala bersumpah untuk yang kena tuduh. Ini adalah sebahagian daripada sistem keterangan dalam syariat Islam.
Contohnya apabila seorang isteri dituduh berzina oleh suaminya dan dia tiada saksi untuk membela diri..maka dia boleh bersumpah isti'azah menafikannya; yg jika dia bersumpah maka Mahkamah akan meminta suaminya turut bersumpah. Sekiranya suaminya bersumpah menegakkan dakwaannya, maka Mahkamah akan neutralise kes. Si isteri akam dibebaskan dari tuduhan zina dan suami akan dibebaskan dari tuduhan qazaf (menuduh tanpa saksi). Tetapi kalau suami enggan bersumpah, maka isteri itu akan dibebaskan tetapi suami mungkin dikenakan tuduhan qazaf.
Tapi yang pentingnya sumpah isti'azah ini hanya boleh dibuat dalam Mahkamah didhadapan seorang Hakim yang melaksanakan undang-undang Islam. Persoalannya adakah kita mengamalkan sistem syariat Islam tersebut. Jelas jawapannya tidak. Maka prasyarat untuk bersumpah itu tidak ujud dalam negara Darul Hadhari kita ni. Janganlah kita terikut-ikut cara bukan Islam ini. Malahan saya berpendapat kalau benar mahukan Anwar bersumpah..kenakanlah pertuduhan terhadap beliau di Mahkamah Syariah yang benar-benar menjalankan hukum-hakam Islam. Wallahua'lam."
asalamuailaikum
semua manusia akan di adili
pada hari Qiamat.
may god bless the soul
of Altantuya Shariibu.
Kita terima sajalah mengakuan Najib, sebagaimana kita terima pengakuan DSAI. Kita tak boleh ada prasangka.
Raja Petrapun tak kata Najib yang buat.
Balapun kata "Bakar bagitau saya Najib..." Ini second hand information. Kalau Bakar yang mengaku itu lain cerita...
Kita manusia ni pun ada kelemahan. Kita suka bermegah, boasting...
MISALNYA
1."Aku jumpa PM hari tu, dia kata kat aku..."
MAKNANYA Memang aku berada dalam dewan hari itu semasa PM berucap. Sempat juga dia berjabat salam dengan aku kerana aku berada di tepi lorong yang dia lalu. Lepas tu dalam ucapan nya dia bagitau (Kepada semua hadirin termasuk aku) yang..."
2.Dalam akuan bersumpah Bala, dia kata "Bakar bagitau aku, Najib..." Ini pun banyak Makna.
Saya rasa Najib seorang yang baik, sebaik kebanyakan orang yang lain juga.
Speaking for myself, no - I don't believe what he has sworn in UMNO meeting.
Even if one were to swear with the Quran alone, it would be insufficient. Swearing is a religious matter, and it is obvious that if one is NOT a true believer, then, the act of swearing does not carry any meaning at all to him.
Also, the punishment to a believer is in the after-life mostly. Justice should also be dealt with in the present-life. We must clearly separate between the two, because not everyone is a believer, and even beliefs have varying degrees of belief, from the agnostics to the fanatics.
There has been far too many questions circulating around regarding the Altantuya case and the submarines and the poor conduct of the judiciary and prosecution team, etc. etc. etc. The immigration records, etc. Very wide scope.
I think - in addition to swearing in UMNO meeting which is clearly inadequate - Najib should at the very least sign an SD that clearly and categorically denies every single allegations.
Just signing an SD to say I have never met, and have never had sex with Altantuya is clearly insufficient in scope.
He must also sign and say that he has not influenced, or committed any crime or abuse of power relating to amending immigration records, and every thing else that has been said about relating to the Altantuya trial as well. Since if he has tried to influence the Altantuya trial, it is still indicative that he is guilty.
Ideally, those who are experts in this case should compile a long list of questions that Rakyat has been asking at coffee shops, Internet, etc. and prepare an SD for Najib to sign. It will be an extremely long SD given what everyone is talking about now ...
Sigh.
Seng said "...amending immigration records..." And today the DG had been charged for corruption. And he is already 55. What a bad omen/luck for him.
May be somebody thought that he did a big favour to some big people by "...amending immigration records..."? Just a thought.
Remember when the KSU went to jail for cbt and corruption - but the Minister from Kelantan was spared?
what 'good reputation' is he talking about?
he never had a good reputation...i mean everyone knows his background.
i'm still trying hard to think of some of his outstanding services to the nation.
yes, he has done well for himself and his family.
Post a Comment