Friday, July 18, 2008

PM DATUK SERI ABDULLAH SAYS DNA SPECIMEN OBSOLETE BUT FORENSIC EXPERTS SAY CAN BE CONSERVED FOR YEARS


Malaysiakini reported that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi supporting the claim by the police that a fresh DNA from Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was required to establish the sodomy claim. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah further informed that the previous DNA sample was too old since it was almost 10 years and no longer 'good'.



But forensic experts claim that DNA samples could be conserved for years and still be able to produce the required results.

Looking at both these statements it could be established that our Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah is seem still 'sleeping' and does not have his facts straight.

It could now be established that this whole episode could have been 'politically motivated' since until now the accused police report have yet to be given to Datuk Seri Anwar or his lawyer to review.

It seems that this weak and 'useless' Barisan Nasional government seem to be 'cooking-up' claims against the Opposition leaders since their popularity seem to be diminishing day by day with numerous problems like fuel hike protest, statutory declarations and so forth, with many more to come.

It time for the rakyat to demand for a Royal Commission of Inquiry on this matter since there seems to be alot of abuse of power been carried out by the police and the BN government.

Day by day, this uncaring, ineffective, inefficient and corrupt Barisan Nasional government seem to contradict their own statements and its time for the rakyat to demand this BN government to STOP ruling the country, to give way for a more reliable, efficient, effective and corrupt-free government.

Will the Barisan Nasional do it?

news n photos courtesy of Malaysiakini

9 comments:

MYblog said...

One thing is very clear. Our PM is an asshole, has no idea about DNA. Kalu tak tahu, tanya lah, jangan macham bodoh.

HAYA buat kita malu saja. Anyone with some sense will know that DNA whether when you are 1 day or of infinite age remains the same. Further even 15 to 20 years DNA can be extracted. AIYOO! What will the world think, we have an asshole as our PM.............Malu lah

Malaysian Malaysia said...

PM said 'DNA is too old' is simply bullshitting !

DNA Carmotograph is computer graphically recorded. Graph do not lie !

It is possible DNA taken from Saiful's Asshole did not match the DNA Carmotogragh taken from DSAI during the 1998- 1999 trial.

Legally, AG office should 'NFA' DSAI case by now. The sodomy case should be thrown out by now.

BN Govt,PM,DPM,IGP,AG, all want the case to stick. So need new fresh DNA sample for fabrication purposes. Saiful's asshole'must be planted' to match the fresh DNA sample

A court order DNA sample taken without consent is inadmissible as evidence.

Syabas to all Peacemakers.

ken said...

pak Lah never watch Jurassic Park and fall sleep during Biology class, hee.....

Who is the idiot chosen him as our PM, let see.... Oiya is Mr. M.

So stupid! Don't make our Biologist lose face. I think Singaporean experts keep laughing at us, fool!

MD said...

NO need to conduct DNA test twice - We don't need the DNA sample, not the blood or sperm sample. Enough with DNA inprint. i.e. the DNA code. One you know the code, it can be printed, publish on any papers, or pictures.

Just like the article we write. Once we wrote the paper, save it on a disk it can be printed and produced in any form, any times. You can print thousand of time - and it still print the article or code that you save.

Just show the court the DNA codes that was presented to the court 10 years ago - and compare it to the codes from samples derived from saiful.

Yes DNA from prehistoric skeletons also don't change.

Bangsa Cina Malaysia said...

MASYARAKAT CINA TETAP BERDIRI KUKUH
DAN MENYOKONG SEPENUHNYA
PIMPINAN DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM
SEBAGAI PM MALAYSIA YANG BARU.

MD said...

What why say is right "...DNA Carmotograph is computer graphically recorded. Graph do not lie"

Just like the barcode that is printed on any product we buy from a supermarket. That barcode we can keep for years, can photocopy it, and it doesn't change. If a product lost a barcode, just print another one and stick to it.

MD said...

Without a new sample - we cannot produce a new code. It means that we cannot fabricate a DNA code (without being discovered). We cannot take any sample from Saiful and ask the computer to produce a DNA imprint that is identical to Anuar's. But if we splash anuar's blood, sperm, saliva etc on or inside saiful body - swap it with tissue, only then the DNA code will match the anuar's DNA imprint.

Police must not take anuar's sample. Just prove that the sample from saiful matched the recorded anuar's DNA record. Then the subject of fabrication doesn't arise.

Unknown said...

The very idea of Badawi giving his half-baked take on old DNA..! He is no authority on DNA! Why should he be saying this and that? It's not in his place to even comment. By speaking thus, he proves it's all part of UMNO's machinations to frame Anwar.

ilhamghaz... said...

Apa punya PM la bodoh sangat...DNA mana boleh ADA TARIKH LUPUT...tetap boleh pakainya...DNA Firaun SAMPAI SEKARANG DAPAT DIKESAN....scientist masih buat kajian sampai sekarang...
kenapa mesti darah aje di ambil untuk DNA, banyak anggota lain boleh di ambil untuk tentukan DNA seseorang. Pie tengok la cerita CSI..air liur atau rambut pun dah cukup untuk buat DNA.